Big Question 7 - Are Smokeless Products a Gateway to Cigarette Smoking?

17 September 2024
CHAPTER 2 . THE BIG QUESTIONS

Big Question 7 - Are Smokeless Products a Gateway to Cigarette Smoking?

Words by

KEY SUMMARY POINTS

01

The gateway effect theory suggests that use of Smokeless Products may increase the likelihood of subsequent cigarette smoking.

02

Methodologies to assess the gateway effect must reflect real world usage and have biochemical verification.

03

While use of Smokeless Products has increased, smoking rates have fallen to historic lows, suggesting that the opposite of the gateway effect is occurring.


“We do believe, however, that causal claims about a strong gateway effect from e-cigarettes to smoking are unlikely to hold, while it remains too early to preclude other smaller or opposing effects.”


Prof L Shahab

University College London [1]

Measuring the Gateway Effect

There are now several longitudinal questionnaire-based studies, as well as review articles, that assess cigarette and Vapour Product use over time. These studies typically measure product use at baseline and then conduct follow-up assessments at one or more subsequent time points. Participants are classified as ‘users’ if they have taken even a single puff in the past 30 days. If a participant reports Vapour Product use at baseline and cigarette smoking at a subsequent follow-up, this may be interpreted as evidence that the Vapour Product acted as a ‘gateway’ to smoking.

Hand using stylus on tablet screen

What does the Evidence on Gateway Effect Show Today?

With respect to the gateway effect, one review article reported that: “There was strong evidence for an association between e-cigarette use among non-smokers and later smoking (OR: 4.59, 95% CI: 3.60 to 5.85) when the results were meta-analysed in a random-effects model. However, there was high heterogeneity (I2=88%).” The authors further concluded: “However, the results do not provide strong evidence of a gateway effect”[2].

An expert roundtable discussion funded by Cancer Research UK came to the following conclusion on the gateway effect: “The group felt that there was no convincing evidence in the UK to support the premise that e-cigarettes are acting as a gateway product in either adult or youth populations. Data have shown that only a small percentage of adult never smokers (0.3%) and youth never smokers (0.5%) are current daily vapers”[3].

One delegate pointed out that if e-cigarettes were in fact a gateway product, one would surely see a rise in the overall population smoking rates since the introduction of e-cigarettes. However, many studies have shown the opposite to be true, with current smoking rates in England declining from 19.9% of adults over the age of 18 in 2010 to 15.5% in 2016[3].

Furthermore, Cancer Research UK concluded: “And the good news is that smoking rates and the perceptions around the acceptability of smoking have declined in young people, even since the introduction of e-cigarettes. So, it doesn’t seem like e-cigarettes have interfered with the promising drop in levels of smoking in young people”[4].

A recent analysis in Belgium of annual survey data showing an increase in e-cigarette use examined the relationship between vaping and smoking among Flemish youth[5].

The survey data, collected by the Vlaams expertisecentrum Alcohol en andere Drugs (VAD) in 2021-2022, were analysed in collaboration with the Vlaams Instituut Gezond Leven.

The analysis reached the following main conclusions::

  • Vaping among the underaged, who have never smoked is low, with 91.2% of those, who have never smoked, reporting that they also have never vaped;
  • E-cigarette use among those who reported never smoking is typically temporary or occasional;
  • Regular vaping is reported primarily by those who currently smoke or have smoked previously; and
  • E-cigarette use among underage individuals is strongly linked to the smoking behaviour of their parents.

In a news release on the analysis, Vlaams Instituut Gezond Leven’s tobacco expert concluded that underaged vaping “is a nuanced story, in which two parameters are very important: the frequency of use and the link with (previous) smoking”[6].

Recommendations for Future Study Design to Assess the Gateway Effect

  • Usage classification should better reflect more representative real-world user behaviours (e.g. is a single puff in the past 30 days an appropriate basis for classifying an individual a smoker or a Vapour Product user?).
  • Questionnaire data should be complemented by biochemical verification, with cotinine and N-(2 cyanoethyl)valine (CEVal) serving as useful markers of nicotine and cigarette use, respectively.
  • Negative controls should be included to help determine whether observed associations are causal.
  • Studies should collect detailed product information (e.g. nicotine strength and flavours used) to enable mechanisms underlying observed associations to be confirmed.

References

A full list of references for this page can be found in the section 11. References.

Exclusive access to the Omni™ Newsletter

 

Join the conversation shaping A Better Tomorrow™.  Sign up to receive exclusive access to the Omni™ Newsletter and future Omni™ updates.

Signing up to the Omni™ Newsletter does not constitute consent to receive marketing communications.